Privacy and surveillance

Alex Reinhart – Updated October 20, 2020 notebooks ·

I am usually frustrated by discussions of privacy, which usually treat it as an end to itself, or only beneficial to people who have “something to hide.” But in discussions about, say, government surveillance programs, privacy isn’t about hiding things—it’s a check on government power. In pithy terms: you don’t get to decide if you have something to hide. The people invading your privacy do, and their decision can have all sorts of negative consequences for you.

This also explains why invasions of privacy are harmful even if they are secret: secret surveillance still represents unchecked government power, making unaccountable secret decisions. Think of Kafka’s The Trial, not Orwell’s 1984.

See also Surveillance capitalism, Interpretable and explainable models, and Predictive policing on policing and privacy (in the form of 4th Amendment searches).

Phillip Rogaway’s The Moral Character of Cryptographic Work is a good argument in favor of the defense of privacy against mass surveillance.

The nature of privacy

Anonymization and privacy protection

Privacy regulations

Privacy and due process

See also Interpretable and explainable models.